<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Follow &gt; Create &gt; Engage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opennasa.com/2008/12/10/follow-create-engage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2008/12/10/follow-create-engage/</link>
	<description>Your NASA, My NASA, OUR NASA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:03:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Fabio</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2008/12/10/follow-create-engage/comment-page-1/#comment-10079</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Fabio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=147#comment-10079</guid>
		<description>A bit slow on the uptake here, since I&#039;m on vacation at the moment, but thanks for the linkage (both personal and business).

And a great post.  I would add that Follow &gt; Create &gt; Engage is not always the correct model to use in every situation, although it does work nicely for groups like the Google Lunar X PRIZE, where I work.  In fact, our strategy is often Follow &gt; Create &gt; Engage &gt; Convert, where to conversion is the act of creating likeminded cohorts who help with the evangelism.  In some circles these people are known as first-tier fans, or tastemakers.  They are the die-hards who don&#039;t just care, but help to spread the word.

Just to respond to rquintanilla&#039;s question: absolutely.  Twitter works very well as just that, if you&#039;d like.  In fact, Twitter has a plethora of uses.  Just browse around for a while to see the many ways Twitter is being used (or just flip on CNN sometime).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit slow on the uptake here, since I&#8217;m on vacation at the moment, but thanks for the linkage (both personal and business).</p>
<p>And a great post.  I would add that Follow &gt; Create &gt; Engage is not always the correct model to use in every situation, although it does work nicely for groups like the Google Lunar X PRIZE, where I work.  In fact, our strategy is often Follow &gt; Create &gt; Engage &gt; Convert, where to conversion is the act of creating likeminded cohorts who help with the evangelism.  In some circles these people are known as first-tier fans, or tastemakers.  They are the die-hards who don&#8217;t just care, but help to spread the word.</p>
<p>Just to respond to rquintanilla&#8217;s question: absolutely.  Twitter works very well as just that, if you&#8217;d like.  In fact, Twitter has a plethora of uses.  Just browse around for a while to see the many ways Twitter is being used (or just flip on CNN sometime).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rquintanilla</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2008/12/10/follow-create-engage/comment-page-1/#comment-9646</link>
		<dc:creator>rquintanilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=147#comment-9646</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post I enjoyed it. Is there any way to use twitter as a private journal of thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post I enjoyed it. Is there any way to use twitter as a private journal of thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
