Gerstenmaier On Multi-Tasking

NASA has some strong leadership, and among the top of those ranks, is Bill Gerstenmaier. Gerstenmaier is the Associate Administrator for Space Operations and is the point man who directs NASA’s human exploration of space. Today at the Project Management Challenge, he gave a really great talk entitled “Thinking on the Job: Distractions, Multitasking, and the Erosion of Attention.”  I posted my notes on the #PMC2009 blog, but thought I’d do the same here.  Multi-tasking, or continuous partial attention, has been a subject that has came up quite a bit lately.  Psychologists have experimented on the nature and limits of human multitasking and shown that multitasking is not as workable as concentrated times.  Still, our increasingly complex, and information overloaded world, almost seems to demand it (or at least that’s the perception).  It’s a problem we all share to some extent or another.  I think Gerstenmaier offers some really invaluable insight into the subject so I wanted to share my notes with everyone.  Oh, and Gerst, if you are reading this, I loved your slides! 

Disclaimer: I multi-tasked and wrote this on my blackberry during his presentation. :)  

Non-renewable resources, time and conscious attention. Are we spending it on the right thing? Priorities. Need to so step back and look at the global level.

What is multitasking? When you switch before a natural break. Problem is that human brain doesn’t switch that quick. You accomplish less, lose efficiency. It may be necessary in today’s world but it doesn’t improve performance.

Some situations call for multitasking. You are probably multi-tasking right now. You need to decide when it makes sense.

There is a lot of unnecessary multi-tasking going on. Its been shown that people in cities are more stressed than people in the country – more distractions, not relaxing. Do we continually overload our senses?  Maybe that’s not good.

Information quantity has nothing to do with it. We probably get to much information. Need to make a conscious limitation.

Information accessibility has everything to do with it. In today’s electronic world you can access information later. Information is no longer hard to get.

There was a time when there was natural limits. In today’s world there are no limits (or at least very few).

You don’t want to let natural selection control what data you see. Don’t multi-task but selectively task.

The result of not selecting is no selection. The quality of data today is not as good. You can now spit information out as fast as you can make it. When it comes to data, quantity is more important than quality. We have to think of ways to select the better data. We have a hard time writing succinct and to the point documents today. Do we really need the extra fluff? We have better bandwidth, but the quality is less.

Talked about a few examples of “the evil of technology.” Does the technology always benefit you the way you think?

Don’t feel like you are going to “miss something.” Focus on what’s important.

Consequences of multi-tasking. Memory less. Studies show falling IQ’s. Effects our work.

What can we do to reduce multi-tasking. Self limit. Make conscious decisions. Take time to take time. Be aware of your limits. Be aware of how you are using your attention. Don’t multi-task around those who deserve your time. Give quality responses. Actively listen.

What if you only checked your email twice a day?

Everything is not urgent or important. Maybe we don’t need “task lists.” Do you really need to be involved in everything?

Think about your environment. Find a place you can think creatively. Use it to enhance your data and help do your work.

Henry David Thoreau once said “Its not enough to be industrious; so are the ants. What are you industrious about?”

5 Responses to “Gerstenmaier On Multi-Tasking”

  1. InfiniteFrontier  on February 26th, 2009

    Nick, what software do you use to make your slide show presentations? It doesn’t look like you use the regular plain powerpoint.

    Reply

  2. Justin  on February 26th, 2009

    I sat in on an introductory Six Sigma class last year that illustrated the dangers of multi-tasking. The instructor had us complete a number and alphabetic sequence exercises. First, we had to switch back and forth every so often and record our time. Then, we were allowed to complete each sequence before moving on to the next and record our time.

    Switching back and forth took me 83 seconds to finish the sequences. Completing the numerical sequence before going on to the alphabetic sequence, in other words, completing each task before I moved on to the next, allowed me to finish in less than 20.

    Reply

  3. Celeste Merryman  on February 27th, 2009

    I am glad Gerstenmaier spoke on this topic and that you (Nick) blogged on it. So many people think that doing more at the same time is better. But, opposite is true and research supports it–it can decrease your smarts and actually wear out your brain. It is good that people in high places are recognizing multi-tasking as a potential workplace hazard.

    Reply

  4. Chip McCann  on March 1st, 2009

    “When it comes to data, quantity is more important than quality.”

    I wasn’t at the PM Challenge, but it sounds like Gerst’s point was exactly the opposite.

    Reply

  5. rquintanilla  on March 6th, 2009

    The information that was outlined from Gerstenmaier is really good and useful. I have already learned some of these the hard way.

    The only challenge I have for some of these is: how do we keep our creativity? In the past, while bulldozing through a mountain of work and being ultra-efficient I have found that my creativity suffers.

    How do we become effecient/productive and maintain our creativity?

    How do we become creative and maintain our effeciency/productivity?

    An old friend of mine once told me there is a difference between working “hard” and working “smart”. At NASA I have worked with some of the hardest working people I have ever worked with. However, I can’t say that “we” don’t always work smart (by “we” I mean the interaction between the different disciplines). The crappy part about things is that when the group suffers it usually isn’t any one individuals fault.

    How do we work “smart” as a group (not as an individual)?

    Reply


Leave a Reply