<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Website Inputs (Follow-Up)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opennasa.com/2009/04/26/website-inputs-follow-up-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/04/26/website-inputs-follow-up-2/</link>
	<description>Your NASA, My NASA, OUR NASA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:14:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/04/26/website-inputs-follow-up-2/comment-page-1/#comment-18793</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=706#comment-18793</guid>
		<description>Very interesting... thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting&#8230; thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/04/26/website-inputs-follow-up-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15422</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=706#comment-15422</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what has been suggested prior to this - just started reading this blog...

One additional reason why NASA needs to embed videos and such: many schools, libraries and workplaces are blocking Facebook, Youtube, Twitter and other video &amp; social networking websites.

One of worst aspects of the NASA website is the awful search features. The NASA websites are very balkanized and I often have to wander around the site(s) for long periods of time looking for the information I need. Often I get lost in the multiple layers of sites.

And please, please get rid of the launch countdown timers for missions! Although dramatic &amp; cool, they don&#039;t provide the info we need (ie we would like to know when a launch is occurring not how long we have to wait until it does).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what has been suggested prior to this &#8211; just started reading this blog&#8230;</p>
<p>One additional reason why NASA needs to embed videos and such: many schools, libraries and workplaces are blocking Facebook, Youtube, Twitter and other video &amp; social networking websites.</p>
<p>One of worst aspects of the NASA website is the awful search features. The NASA websites are very balkanized and I often have to wander around the site(s) for long periods of time looking for the information I need. Often I get lost in the multiple layers of sites.</p>
<p>And please, please get rid of the launch countdown timers for missions! Although dramatic &amp; cool, they don&#8217;t provide the info we need (ie we would like to know when a launch is occurring not how long we have to wait until it does).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InfiniteFrontier</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/04/26/website-inputs-follow-up-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13915</link>
		<dc:creator>InfiniteFrontier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=706#comment-13915</guid>
		<description>Brian,

First of all, thank you for your detailed response to many of our suggestions.

In the Website Inputs document you said: &quot;I don’t necessarily agree that an embed link is necessary to get the word out about a video; good content will do that itself. Others may disagree.&quot; and so I&#039;d like to clarify why I think embed links are important. I ask myself the question, are we interested in (1) the general public coming to the official website or are we more interested in (2) the general public learning about NASA? I think the answer is (2), which I think means we need to bring the content to them (and not necessarily bring them to us). I think the NASA website has done a great job of that through YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter. I also think that allowing official NASA content to be embeddable would help spread NASA content better than just a simple link would do. A link requires the user to leave the site they are currently at (which they may not be interested in doing). Whenever I think of content that has spread virally I usually think of YouTube videos. In my opinion the reason they are so viral is because they are literally everywhere on the internet (not just on YouTube).

Here&#039;s an extra suggestion I didn&#039;t see answered on the Website inputs document: Allow website users to vote up or down an article just like the websites Digg.com and Reddit.com do (or alternatively continue using the existing rating system) and then have a NASA &quot;top stories&quot; page that has the highest ranked stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>First of all, thank you for your detailed response to many of our suggestions.</p>
<p>In the Website Inputs document you said: &#8220;I don’t necessarily agree that an embed link is necessary to get the word out about a video; good content will do that itself. Others may disagree.&#8221; and so I&#8217;d like to clarify why I think embed links are important. I ask myself the question, are we interested in (1) the general public coming to the official website or are we more interested in (2) the general public learning about NASA? I think the answer is (2), which I think means we need to bring the content to them (and not necessarily bring them to us). I think the NASA website has done a great job of that through YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter. I also think that allowing official NASA content to be embeddable would help spread NASA content better than just a simple link would do. A link requires the user to leave the site they are currently at (which they may not be interested in doing). Whenever I think of content that has spread virally I usually think of YouTube videos. In my opinion the reason they are so viral is because they are literally everywhere on the internet (not just on YouTube).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an extra suggestion I didn&#8217;t see answered on the Website inputs document: Allow website users to vote up or down an article just like the websites Digg.com and Reddit.com do (or alternatively continue using the existing rating system) and then have a NASA &#8220;top stories&#8221; page that has the highest ranked stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

