NASA: Cultural Dust Storm
When everyone was looking for moondust from the LCROSS mission to crash land into the moon, I noticed something else — a cultural dust storm inside the agency. Did you see it too?
We heavily publicized the “moon landing” prior to Friday’s event. In Washington DC, the Newseum hosted our “Let’s Kick Up Some Moon Dust” party. (Even my mother received an email from NASA inviting her to attend. Not sure exactly how THAT happened. No matter.)
I was off work on “LCROSS day,” so I logged onto NASA TV to watch the lunar impact. I mean, really. Who DOESn’t want to see moon dust? Watching the mission coverage, though, took me by surprise.
Stop! Before I go any further, I must in all fairness disclose that I work the “human space flight” side of the house at NASA. I say this only to put in context my perspective. I’m accustomed to years upon years (yes decades even) of Space Shuttle launch and Space Station on-orbit coverage — the hushed, almost flat voices of our Public Affairs folks doing commentary, the CapCom astronaut speaking to the crew, and crew responses. Calm. Even. Almost hypnotic. (No offense guys. I’m just trying to frame my point.)
Back to LCROSS coverage. I listened to chatter between the console folks — camera commands, I believe. Some of the voices struck me as jarring. Maybe it was early in the morning, but I found myself reacting to the sound of the voices. (InCREdibly petty. I know. I know. Who cares what they sound like, right? It’s the mission that’s important! Yes, I get it. Really I do. I’m merely describing my reaction.)
I watched the tiny NASA TV window on my laptop as the spacecraft rocketed closer and closer. I listened to the Go/No Go count and wondered about the spacecraft barreling toward the moon. Could we even turn it around if someone voted “no-go?” Hmmm. Not my mission.
I captured screenshots and posted them on Twitpic. I personally love this near-infrared shot below. I think it would make cool Moon art.
Impact! We hit the moon, didn’t we?
Yes, the announcer confirmed “contact”…as in crash landing. I was a bit confused. My little NASA TV screen only showed gray fuzziness. The announcer revealed a second impact. Hard to tell. I was still watching blurry images on my computer.
Further confirmation: NASA TV switched to images of arm slapping/hand shaking in the control room, then camera views somewhere outside where we could see happy people in lawn chairs. Then, back to the Control Room:
The Flight Director stood up, put his hands on his hips, and looked directly into the camera. Odd.
Twitter lit up with Moon Dust…or lack thereof…chatter. Some out in the vast twitterverse cheered the achievement. Some expressed anger at NASA for “bombing” a gentle giant. Some voiced confusion about what happened (mirroring my reaction). Some made fun of the coverage.
The social media world joined in for a global conversation about space. Differing opinions, some unflattering, but conversation none-the-less.
I’ve been thinking about my reaction to mission coverage and wondering what it says about me. I’ll be honest, compared to a Shuttle launch, LCROSS felt like the minor leagues. Does that mean I’m arrogant? I’ve really struggled over the weekend to understand WHY I felt underwhelmed by the “Kick Up Some Moon Dust” experience (other than the fact that we didn’t witness a massive cloud of dust — which may mean water).
Here’s what hit me last night: the culture clash between human vs. robotic, engineering vs. science.
I’ve noticed, through my many years at NASA, that our engineers want to tweak perfection, while our scientists want gather more data, to ask one more question, try one more approach. The LCROSS mission is a success because it’s one more approach to asking another question so that we better understand what questions to ask. Their scientific mission is just beginning with lunar impact. Our human space flight missions, in contrast, end upon touchdown or docking — when we safely arrive at our destinations.
We’ve been doing this Shuttle thing for quite some time. The culture of how we do what and what is acceptable is quite ingrained. Launch coverage and mission control cultural norms rule. I fell victim to my human space flight cultural heritage when I subconsciously compared “our” launch coverage with “their” launch coverage…and giggled. Yes, I admit. I giggled — which is not fair to the serious work behind the mission. I feel very rude. Scientific, robotic missions are ruled by different cultural norms.
Look no further than the contrast between the Houston Mission Control “flat-top” and the California “flip-flop” mentality. Both approaches get the job done — just differently.
Now that I’ve had a few days to process, I apologize to all you LCROSS folks. I let my cultural bias cloud (moon dust?) my perception of your mission coverage. Though, I do hope your Hi-5 guy gets a shot at the late-night comedy shows. He deserves a shout out!
Bravo LCROSS. Ignore NASA’s cultural dust storm. We expect your results to “water” it down.
Crosspost on bethbeck.wordpress.com.
2 Responses to “NASA: Cultural Dust Storm”
Leave a Reply








dden on October 13th, 2009
The airframes of the space shuttle orbiters are certified for 400 flights each, so the existing fleet could fly more than 1000 times before they had to be retired.
The orbiters are magnificent vehicles with untapped potential. The only problems they have ever had are due to the cumbersome and dangerous way they are launched. Faulty boosters and debris hitting the vehicles during launch account for all of its failures.
If an orbiter were mounted on top of the new Ares V booster, no debris would hit it during launch. Since the planned Ares V is the most powerful rocket ever designed, it could launch a shuttle orbiter into earth orbit without the orbiter having to use its main engines.
If large fuel tanks were installed in the payload bay, and the main engines were modified so that they could be started in space, a shuttle orbiter could be placed in earth orbit with the capability to perform a trans-lunar injection burn with its main engines and reach lunar orbit, where it could rendezvous with the planned Altair lunar lander, which would be launched separately.
After lunar operations were concluded, the orbiter would fire its engines again and return to Earth, where it would reenter earth orbit by performing a multiple pass aerobraking maneuver, in which the orbiter would skim through the upper atmosphere and slow down enough to go back into space and enter an elliptical orbit which would automatically bring it around for another pass through the atmosphere. The orbiter would make several passes, never getting hot enough to exceed the limits of the thermal protection system.
After two or three passes, the orbiter would enter a standard orbit around Earth and dock with the International Space Station.
This would be the achievement of an extremely sophisticated Earth-Lunar flight capability and would tie all of the threads of the space program, the X-series rocket plane program, the Apollo program, the Shuttle program and the Space Station, into a unified structure that would look as if it had been coherently planned.
Humanity would be inspired to see that the achievements and knowledge gained from past programs have not been wasted, but have all been woven into an elegant and sophisticated consolidation of our hard won victories in near Earth space.
I have a graphic of a shuttle orbiter mounted on the Ares V and will send it to you if you give me an address.
Farnham on October 16th, 2009
Excellent post and insight (or incite) about ‘no bucks, no Buck Rogers’ differences among missions. More than ever, the media is hyper-sensitive to sound bites, quick tweets and snappy cynicism about anything innovative, progressive or intellectual.
It might require a little more balance between publicity and information sharing, especially concerning the more scientific missions. I flinched every time I a heard a cable newshead say “Bombing the Moon” …
For most of the reasonable and more silent portion of the population, the shear weight of the concepts being explored by missions like LCROSS is enough to spark our interest and ensure ongoing fascination and support.