<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making NASA Cool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opennasa.com/2009/10/19/making-nasa-cool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/10/19/making-nasa-cool/</link>
	<description>Your NASA, My NASA, OUR NASA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:03:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike D</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/10/19/making-nasa-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-37857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1200#comment-37857</guid>
		<description>If NASA wants to be cool it needs to get BOLD and be inspiring not just get some baggy pants and turn its hat backwards. 
 
hate to say but paperless is not bold its just inevitable so let it happen with the market. 
 
I work in the entertainment industry and the main thing nowadays is 24/7 content content content.  NASA needs to churn out digital content as fast as possible have a team making robotics apps for iphone and Android devices to spark the interest of youth.  Rovers on the moon that you can drive over a website.  Way out of the box space experiments that can be handed over to the public at large to help out with(ex stardust study). People don&#039;t care much about NASA because its not working on getting you and me into space fast enough.  People have no time or patients they want too much. 
Not too unlike Kennedy wanted from Apollo.  I say give it to them.  Get Bold or  Go Home... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If NASA wants to be cool it needs to get BOLD and be inspiring not just get some baggy pants and turn its hat backwards. </p>
<p>hate to say but paperless is not bold its just inevitable so let it happen with the market. </p>
<p>I work in the entertainment industry and the main thing nowadays is 24/7 content content content.  NASA needs to churn out digital content as fast as possible have a team making robotics apps for iphone and Android devices to spark the interest of youth.  Rovers on the moon that you can drive over a website.  Way out of the box space experiments that can be handed over to the public at large to help out with(ex stardust study). People don&#039;t care much about NASA because its not working on getting you and me into space fast enough.  People have no time or patients they want too much.<br />
Not too unlike Kennedy wanted from Apollo.  I say give it to them.  Get Bold or  Go Home&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/10/19/making-nasa-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-31587</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1200#comment-31587</guid>
		<description>Paperless - good suggestion but my god that is BORING!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paperless &#8211; good suggestion but my god that is BORING!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolando Quintanilla</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/10/19/making-nasa-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-31477</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolando Quintanilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1200#comment-31477</guid>
		<description>Correction.  The technology needed to go paperless is already on the market.  The B&amp;N Nook has an LCD screen in the bottom that will run Android.  

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9139710/Analysis_Nook_could_pre_empt_the_rumored_Apple_tablet_?taxonomyId=15&amp;pageNumber=1  

Above Article has 

&quot;Lynch also said using Android version 1.5 on Nook &quot;opens up exciting opportunities&quot; for third-party Android applications built by the open source community. While that application capability was not the driving reason for picking Android, Lynch said that Barnes &amp; Noble is planning to put out an SDK for Android developers. He said the Android OS was primarily selected for its navigation and user interface capabilities.&quot;

Getting the desired output requires a little bit of work, but the technology is available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction.  The technology needed to go paperless is already on the market.  The B&#038;N Nook has an LCD screen in the bottom that will run Android.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9139710/Analysis_Nook_could_pre_empt_the_rumored_Apple_tablet_?taxonomyId=15&#038;pageNumber=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.computerworld.com/s.....geNumber=1</a>  </p>
<p>Above Article has </p>
<p>&#8220;Lynch also said using Android version 1.5 on Nook &#8220;opens up exciting opportunities&#8221; for third-party Android applications built by the open source community. While that application capability was not the driving reason for picking Android, Lynch said that Barnes &#038; Noble is planning to put out an SDK for Android developers. He said the Android OS was primarily selected for its navigation and user interface capabilities.&#8221;</p>
<p>Getting the desired output requires a little bit of work, but the technology is available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolando Quintanilla</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/10/19/making-nasa-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-31475</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolando Quintanilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1200#comment-31475</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s go PAPERLESS, using ebook and tablet technologies.  This technology is already developed and is coming into the market (Amazon Kindle, B&amp;N Nook).  These ebook companies will need to prove their worth in the Business arena.  The fact that they are trying to get into a new market, could be used as an incentive for them to help NASA run a trial with going paperless, for free (or a small cost).  If the trial works NASA goes paperless, and the cooperating company gets great publicity and a proof of concept.  NASA also gets great publicity.  

Further, this technology will help NASA increase quality while increasing efficiency.  It is also good for the green movement (to an extent).  

Going paperless is extremely cool, innovative and high-tech (at least now).  Being the first to do it would make us look really cool.  

The technologies needed to do this are most likely in the test phase right now.  If NASA collaborates with these companies, we might be able to get the technology before it comes out to market.  If collaboration is not possible, NASA needs to be on alert that this technology is coming and needs to be ready to implement it soon after it is available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s go PAPERLESS, using ebook and tablet technologies.  This technology is already developed and is coming into the market (Amazon Kindle, B&#038;N Nook).  These ebook companies will need to prove their worth in the Business arena.  The fact that they are trying to get into a new market, could be used as an incentive for them to help NASA run a trial with going paperless, for free (or a small cost).  If the trial works NASA goes paperless, and the cooperating company gets great publicity and a proof of concept.  NASA also gets great publicity.  </p>
<p>Further, this technology will help NASA increase quality while increasing efficiency.  It is also good for the green movement (to an extent).  </p>
<p>Going paperless is extremely cool, innovative and high-tech (at least now).  Being the first to do it would make us look really cool.  </p>
<p>The technologies needed to do this are most likely in the test phase right now.  If NASA collaborates with these companies, we might be able to get the technology before it comes out to market.  If collaboration is not possible, NASA needs to be on alert that this technology is coming and needs to be ready to implement it soon after it is available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/10/19/making-nasa-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-31442</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1200#comment-31442</guid>
		<description>One way to make NASA cool again is to get the agency to stop shooting itself in the foot - ie the recent LCROSS PR fiasco. NASA produced a slick DVD  but didn&#039;t send it until 2 days before the event. Then they told the media that the plume would be visible to the public when it was painfully obvious that it would be daylight across half the country and likely too faint to see anyway in the other half.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One way to make NASA cool again is to get the agency to stop shooting itself in the foot &#8211; ie the recent LCROSS PR fiasco. NASA produced a slick DVD  but didn&#8217;t send it until 2 days before the event. Then they told the media that the plume would be visible to the public when it was painfully obvious that it would be daylight across half the country and likely too faint to see anyway in the other half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/10/19/making-nasa-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-31323</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1200#comment-31323</guid>
		<description>I think a better motto might be &quot;Making NASA Relevant.&quot;  A few of my friends always say that NASA seems like a cool place to work, but follow up by saying they still don&#039;t see NASA as relevant in their everyday lives.  We all know that&#039;s not true :) but using &#039;relevant&#039; might bring out a more-focused set of ideas.

Glad to see the enthusiasm spreading to multiple centers and keep us updated on progress at Langley!  I have a few more comments that I will post later this afternoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a better motto might be &#8220;Making NASA Relevant.&#8221;  A few of my friends always say that NASA seems like a cool place to work, but follow up by saying they still don&#8217;t see NASA as relevant in their everyday lives.  We all know that&#8217;s not true <img src='http://www.opennasa.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  but using &#8216;relevant&#8217; might bring out a more-focused set of ideas.</p>
<p>Glad to see the enthusiasm spreading to multiple centers and keep us updated on progress at Langley!  I have a few more comments that I will post later this afternoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
