<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NASA&#8217;s Vision and Mission</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/10/nasas-vision-and-mission/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/10/nasas-vision-and-mission/</link>
	<description>Your NASA, My NASA, OUR NASA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:14:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Egan</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/10/nasas-vision-and-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-35615</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Egan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1285#comment-35615</guid>
		<description>Mission and vision statements are old hat. 
 
What we all want to know about an organisation is its purpose. MSFC and JPL have a clear idea what their purpose is. 
 
I fear the President is waiting for a health bill from congress to sign into law and a setting in concrete of his new strategy for Afghanistan before he sends a new Bill to congress after consideration of the Augustine report.  
 
In the big picture, exploring the cosmos can wait a few months to sort out some more urgent earthly matters.  
 
It is a major failing of western democracies that there are so few scientists and engineers in elected office. This is our achilles heel. China&#039;s achilles heel is too many engineers at the top of government.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mission and vision statements are old hat. </p>
<p>What we all want to know about an organisation is its purpose. MSFC and JPL have a clear idea what their purpose is. </p>
<p>I fear the President is waiting for a health bill from congress to sign into law and a setting in concrete of his new strategy for Afghanistan before he sends a new Bill to congress after consideration of the Augustine report.  </p>
<p>In the big picture, exploring the cosmos can wait a few months to sort out some more urgent earthly matters.  </p>
<p>It is a major failing of western democracies that there are so few scientists and engineers in elected office. This is our achilles heel. China&#039;s achilles heel is too many engineers at the top of government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QED</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/10/nasas-vision-and-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-34800</link>
		<dc:creator>QED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1285#comment-34800</guid>
		<description>It just seems so obvious that we&#039;ve now out-plundered our planet (long treated as an infinite resource) and must branch out into space  to engage with a practically infinite resource. If the vision isn&#039;t looking towards this ends then it is, by definition, unsustainable and pointless. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just seems so obvious that we&#039;ve now out-plundered our planet (long treated as an infinite resource) and must branch out into space  to engage with a practically infinite resource. If the vision isn&#039;t looking towards this ends then it is, by definition, unsustainable and pointless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/10/nasas-vision-and-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-34126</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1285#comment-34126</guid>
		<description>@Mallette I would argue that space is already profitable, but we must make it more so.

Profit - noun - An advantageous gain or return; benefit.
Profit - verb - to derive benefit from.

Space Exploration has given us:
- Vast Knowledge
- Many technologies and technological improvements
- Inspiration to be better and understand more of our world.

Space Exploration on a grander scale can give us:
- More Knowledge
- Better Technologies/ New Technologies
- Greater Resources to bring to the market
- Increased Survivability of Humanity 


Is space profitable? Yes. Will it continue to be so? Yes.

Is it profitable in a market sense? Yes.
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0911/07markets/

Is there a potential for growth? I don&#039;t know...the universe is pretty big I guess. 

Is this a longterm play? Yes. So keep going everyone, we&#039;ll get there.

Hmmm...Maybe if we use more cowbell we can get there quicker???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mallette I would argue that space is already profitable, but we must make it more so.</p>
<p>Profit &#8211; noun &#8211; An advantageous gain or return; benefit.<br />
Profit &#8211; verb &#8211; to derive benefit from.</p>
<p>Space Exploration has given us:<br />
- Vast Knowledge<br />
- Many technologies and technological improvements<br />
- Inspiration to be better and understand more of our world.</p>
<p>Space Exploration on a grander scale can give us:<br />
- More Knowledge<br />
- Better Technologies/ New Technologies<br />
- Greater Resources to bring to the market<br />
- Increased Survivability of Humanity </p>
<p>Is space profitable? Yes. Will it continue to be so? Yes.</p>
<p>Is it profitable in a market sense? Yes.<br />
<a href="http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0911/07markets/" rel="nofollow">http://www.spaceflightnow.com/.....07markets/</a></p>
<p>Is there a potential for growth? I don&#8217;t know&#8230;the universe is pretty big I guess. </p>
<p>Is this a longterm play? Yes. So keep going everyone, we&#8217;ll get there.</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;Maybe if we use more cowbell we can get there quicker???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skytland</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/10/nasas-vision-and-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-34048</link>
		<dc:creator>Skytland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1285#comment-34048</guid>
		<description>Thanks for responding Gabe!  (I&#039;m testing out the new nested comment feature I just installed so people can respond directly to others comments).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for responding Gabe!  (I&#8217;m testing out the new nested comment feature I just installed so people can respond directly to others comments).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolando Quintanilla</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/10/nasas-vision-and-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-33994</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolando Quintanilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1285#comment-33994</guid>
		<description>@Natalie, those are some pretty cool vision statements.  I can get excited about helping fulfill those vision statements.  

@gwrieger, I believe that while exploring space we can solve many of humanities biggest problems.  In order to better serve the public, and gain their support for our primary mission (explore space) we will have to put humanity issues at the forefront of decision making.  When we do, our minds will be open to solutions that most affect humanity and the solutions we generate will inspire and engage the public.  If we work with industry, we have the potential of creating new spin-off industries that are not necessarily associated to space exploration.  

My Vision

1.  To make NASA the standard by which other organizations measure their success. (this includes industry).   
2.  To solve earth&#039;s most challenging problems, by exploring space. 
3.  Innovate, through an Abundance Mentality where we leverage internal and external resources to create more pies, instead of working off of a zero-sum paradigm.   
4.  Make NASA the best organization to PARTNER with.  

Problems I know that we can solve with our partners: 

1)Energy Independence  -- space is tough, we need to be very effecient.  
2)Transportation Technologies and Methodologies
3)Manufacturing Techniques - (assuming we manufacture items in space, to reduce payload size, same for &quot;2)&quot;)
4)Light Weight but Strong Materials 
5)Smart Materials – change shape on demand. We can partner with the military organizations and corresponding industry.  Same for &quot;4)&quot;.
6)Human Biology/Health

7)Sustainability/Green Tech – space is tough, we will need to be extremely effecient.  

8)Education - space can inspire the young to learn engineering and science, and technology that allows us to train the workforce cheaply can be leveraged across the world to increase education.  We can partner with government agencies dedicated to education, other countries, and open-source movement.  

9)Innovation -- In order to stretch the dollar and provide the most impact per dollar, we have to innovate.  Maintaining the status quote will not be sufficient.  Innovating how we do things, will save a lot of money.  Innovating how we partner with other organizations large and small will bring in money for our needs.  

10)Robotic technology</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Natalie, those are some pretty cool vision statements.  I can get excited about helping fulfill those vision statements.  </p>
<p>@gwrieger, I believe that while exploring space we can solve many of humanities biggest problems.  In order to better serve the public, and gain their support for our primary mission (explore space) we will have to put humanity issues at the forefront of decision making.  When we do, our minds will be open to solutions that most affect humanity and the solutions we generate will inspire and engage the public.  If we work with industry, we have the potential of creating new spin-off industries that are not necessarily associated to space exploration.  </p>
<p>My Vision</p>
<p>1.  To make NASA the standard by which other organizations measure their success. (this includes industry).<br />
2.  To solve earth&#8217;s most challenging problems, by exploring space.<br />
3.  Innovate, through an Abundance Mentality where we leverage internal and external resources to create more pies, instead of working off of a zero-sum paradigm.<br />
4.  Make NASA the best organization to PARTNER with.  </p>
<p>Problems I know that we can solve with our partners: </p>
<p>1)Energy Independence  &#8212; space is tough, we need to be very effecient.<br />
2)Transportation Technologies and Methodologies<br />
3)Manufacturing Techniques &#8211; (assuming we manufacture items in space, to reduce payload size, same for &#8220;2)&#8221;)<br />
4)Light Weight but Strong Materials<br />
5)Smart Materials – change shape on demand. We can partner with the military organizations and corresponding industry.  Same for &#8220;4)&#8221;.<br />
6)Human Biology/Health</p>
<p>7)Sustainability/Green Tech – space is tough, we will need to be extremely effecient.  </p>
<p>8)Education &#8211; space can inspire the young to learn engineering and science, and technology that allows us to train the workforce cheaply can be leveraged across the world to increase education.  We can partner with government agencies dedicated to education, other countries, and open-source movement.  </p>
<p>9)Innovation &#8212; In order to stretch the dollar and provide the most impact per dollar, we have to innovate.  Maintaining the status quote will not be sufficient.  Innovating how we do things, will save a lot of money.  Innovating how we partner with other organizations large and small will bring in money for our needs.  </p>
<p>10)Robotic technology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwrieger</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/10/nasas-vision-and-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-33978</link>
		<dc:creator>gwrieger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1285#comment-33978</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s up Nick et Al.

Douglas said what I was going to, but better. 

Mission Statement? NASA will facilitate future space exploration technologies.

If it&#039;s JSC-specific, then you should probably tie in some type of &#039;human element&#039; to the vision/mission statement(s).

I don&#039;t think NASA needs to be associated in such a big way with humanity as your post repeated a few times.  It&#039;s the Aeronautics and Space Administration - not the National Humanities Association.  Humanity, literally, doesn&#039;t include science at all does it?

Further, everyone knows green sustainability is a key to business moving forward - no need to harp on the obvious. Let&#039;s not get carried away here.  Sounds like NASA is going to save the human race!  Save that tag line for our grandchildren&#039;s children. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s up Nick et Al.</p>
<p>Douglas said what I was going to, but better. </p>
<p>Mission Statement? NASA will facilitate future space exploration technologies.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s JSC-specific, then you should probably tie in some type of &#8216;human element&#8217; to the vision/mission statement(s).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think NASA needs to be associated in such a big way with humanity as your post repeated a few times.  It&#8217;s the Aeronautics and Space Administration &#8211; not the National Humanities Association.  Humanity, literally, doesn&#8217;t include science at all does it?</p>
<p>Further, everyone knows green sustainability is a key to business moving forward &#8211; no need to harp on the obvious. Let&#8217;s not get carried away here.  Sounds like NASA is going to save the human race!  Save that tag line for our grandchildren&#8217;s children. <img src='http://www.opennasa.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: circulating</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/10/nasas-vision-and-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-33975</link>
		<dc:creator>circulating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1285#comment-33975</guid>
		<description>Undertake the Universe to Ensure our Earth

all with more cowbell of course... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Undertake the Universe to Ensure our Earth</p>
<p>all with more cowbell of course&#8230; <img src='http://www.opennasa.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Mallette</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/10/nasas-vision-and-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-33953</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Mallette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1285#comment-33953</guid>
		<description>NASA must ensure the commercialization and privatization of space, focusing on tasks above the realistic capabilities of the private sector, and passing all other tasks to them.

Key note with this is not to underestimate the capabilities of the private sector, nor their drive and desire to make space profitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NASA must ensure the commercialization and privatization of space, focusing on tasks above the realistic capabilities of the private sector, and passing all other tasks to them.</p>
<p>Key note with this is not to underestimate the capabilities of the private sector, nor their drive and desire to make space profitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

