<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government in the Digital Age</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/25/government-in-the-digital-age/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/25/government-in-the-digital-age/</link>
	<description>Your NASA, My NASA, OUR NASA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:33:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/25/government-in-the-digital-age/comment-page-1/#comment-36695</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1357#comment-36695</guid>
		<description>2) Yes, but with significant consideration for the result in productivity it would create (see Tim Ferriss&#039; &quot;Four Hour Work Week&quot; for a great distinction between productivity and efficiency).  Anyone who uses an iPhone or personal computer can testify to the increase in efficiency these items provide in our daily lives.  We now have access to Facebook/Twitter/e-mail anywhere and everywhere, along with the capability to accommodate instant changes in plan with minimal difficulty. 
 
The Blackberry revolution is a great example of how efficiency is increased, but productivity is sacrificed, due to device integration.  Consider a weekly staff meeting or technical conference.  Think about how many people have their heads buried in their Blackberry devices rather than listening to the conversation for which they were all gathered.  Yes, you can check your e-mails two seconds after they are received, but unless you can provide a one-word answer to that e-mail, you will end up re-reading that e-mail at your desk before providing a response because its content has been replaced by other information that has been absorbed by your brain. 
 
Integrating devices that increase productivity can yield significant results, but devices that only increase efficiency are often-times nothing more than productivity inhibitors. 
 
The integration of workforces and boundary-less organizations is a desirable goal when the scope is sufficiently limited.  Integration with the intent of eliminating &quot;excess spending and contract duality&quot; is a wonderful idea.  Integration that focuses on removing agency-level boundaries for multi-focused agencies such as NASA may do more harm than good.  The many directorates and varied research efforts within NASA are too broad to open completely.  Having worked with the agency, I found that I had quite open access to a broad range of people outside of my immediate field of focus.  However, the difficulty was in accessing people within my own directorate and program.  The immediate area of concern, in my opinion, is removing the boundaries within specific programs before removing boundaries at the agency level. 
 
Change the way of doing business in a bottom-up, not top-down, manner. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2) Yes, but with significant consideration for the result in productivity it would create (see Tim Ferriss&#039; &quot;Four Hour Work Week&quot; for a great distinction between productivity and efficiency).  Anyone who uses an iPhone or personal computer can testify to the increase in efficiency these items provide in our daily lives.  We now have access to Facebook/Twitter/e-mail anywhere and everywhere, along with the capability to accommodate instant changes in plan with minimal difficulty. </p>
<p>The Blackberry revolution is a great example of how efficiency is increased, but productivity is sacrificed, due to device integration.  Consider a weekly staff meeting or technical conference.  Think about how many people have their heads buried in their Blackberry devices rather than listening to the conversation for which they were all gathered.  Yes, you can check your e-mails two seconds after they are received, but unless you can provide a one-word answer to that e-mail, you will end up re-reading that e-mail at your desk before providing a response because its content has been replaced by other information that has been absorbed by your brain. </p>
<p>Integrating devices that increase productivity can yield significant results, but devices that only increase efficiency are often-times nothing more than productivity inhibitors. </p>
<p>The integration of workforces and boundary-less organizations is a desirable goal when the scope is sufficiently limited.  Integration with the intent of eliminating &quot;excess spending and contract duality&quot; is a wonderful idea.  Integration that focuses on removing agency-level boundaries for multi-focused agencies such as NASA may do more harm than good.  The many directorates and varied research efforts within NASA are too broad to open completely.  Having worked with the agency, I found that I had quite open access to a broad range of people outside of my immediate field of focus.  However, the difficulty was in accessing people within my own directorate and program.  The immediate area of concern, in my opinion, is removing the boundaries within specific programs before removing boundaries at the agency level. </p>
<p>Change the way of doing business in a bottom-up, not top-down, manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/25/government-in-the-digital-age/comment-page-1/#comment-36684</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1357#comment-36684</guid>
		<description>1) No, privacy should not be sacrificed in the name of transparency.  Perhaps we should examine the purview of what is considered &quot;privacy&quot; in this day and age, but it should not be sacrificed in order to be more transparent.  In my experience, the goal of transparency is noble, but its implementation is nothing more than re-organizing a website or database to bring previously-assumed &quot;private&quot; information into the public eye.  We live in an age where instant gratification is essential to success.  Translation: If it&#039;s not within our immediate view, we assume it doesn&#039;t exist.  Rather than remove privacy, we should examine what information is already available.  Privacy has been around since the beginning of human interaction.  To propose eliminating it, or significantly reducing it at any level, for the sake of transparency is over-extending the power of any government or group of individuals. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) No, privacy should not be sacrificed in the name of transparency.  Perhaps we should examine the purview of what is considered &quot;privacy&quot; in this day and age, but it should not be sacrificed in order to be more transparent.  In my experience, the goal of transparency is noble, but its implementation is nothing more than re-organizing a website or database to bring previously-assumed &quot;private&quot; information into the public eye.  We live in an age where instant gratification is essential to success.  Translation: If it&#039;s not within our immediate view, we assume it doesn&#039;t exist.  Rather than remove privacy, we should examine what information is already available.  Privacy has been around since the beginning of human interaction.  To propose eliminating it, or significantly reducing it at any level, for the sake of transparency is over-extending the power of any government or group of individuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lad</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/25/government-in-the-digital-age/comment-page-1/#comment-36489</link>
		<dc:creator>lad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1357#comment-36489</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all about balancing what you know with what you do with it, without abusing it, but sharing it in appropriate ways using appropriate avenues.  Just like it&#039;s wrong to correct someone with an email, when it should be done in person, social media etiquette will have to be taken into consideration by management teams throughout not only public entities, but private ones, as well.  There&#039;s already plenty of abuse in the media, but I believe the public sector has a higher level of responsibility of being good stewards of information and how it is disseminated.  This will give policy makers a whole new set of ideas and issues to consider, and should be integrated both horizontally and vertically as policies progress.  Certainly, the legal profession will weigh in - but as responsible citizens, public sector employees can take the lead and set the standard. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s all about balancing what you know with what you do with it, without abusing it, but sharing it in appropriate ways using appropriate avenues.  Just like it&#039;s wrong to correct someone with an email, when it should be done in person, social media etiquette will have to be taken into consideration by management teams throughout not only public entities, but private ones, as well.  There&#039;s already plenty of abuse in the media, but I believe the public sector has a higher level of responsibility of being good stewards of information and how it is disseminated.  This will give policy makers a whole new set of ideas and issues to consider, and should be integrated both horizontally and vertically as policies progress.  Certainly, the legal profession will weigh in &#8211; but as responsible citizens, public sector employees can take the lead and set the standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/25/government-in-the-digital-age/comment-page-1/#comment-36199</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1357#comment-36199</guid>
		<description>Questions on your questions: 
 
wrt to Question 1) Are you referring to govt privacy vs personal privacy? 
 
wrt to Question 2)  Information technologies may speed up the rate of information transfer and integration but they are not an end in themselves. The role and top priority for the public sector is performing their function - not just adding technology for its own sake. You need to show that the addition of technology will solve the problem. It may not. It may be the  people whose hands are on the levers. 
 
wrt to Question 3) You did not identify any guidelines which would govern the public sector workers to disseminate information. One role management plays is to filter the content wrt to constraints. Taken to the extreme should you be able to post encryption keys for commanding satellites, or post troops movements or post scientific data before it has been analyzed by principal investigators </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Questions on your questions: </p>
<p>wrt to Question 1) Are you referring to govt privacy vs personal privacy? </p>
<p>wrt to Question 2)  Information technologies may speed up the rate of information transfer and integration but they are not an end in themselves. The role and top priority for the public sector is performing their function &#8211; not just adding technology for its own sake. You need to show that the addition of technology will solve the problem. It may not. It may be the  people whose hands are on the levers. </p>
<p>wrt to Question 3) You did not identify any guidelines which would govern the public sector workers to disseminate information. One role management plays is to filter the content wrt to constraints. Taken to the extreme should you be able to post encryption keys for commanding satellites, or post troops movements or post scientific data before it has been analyzed by principal investigators</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.opennasa.com/2009/11/25/government-in-the-digital-age/comment-page-1/#comment-35717</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opennasa.com/?p=1357#comment-35717</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by govfresh: Government in the Digital Age via @NASA: http://bit.ly/6HyR7z #gov20...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by govfresh: Government in the Digital Age via @NASA: <a href="http://bit.ly/6HyR7z" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6HyR7z</a> #gov20&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
