I have a friend who was recently identified as a NASA Future Leader in some publication that is supposed to be arriving in my mailbox soon. I’m horrified… the agency should be ashamed that it is trying to make such an allegation!
Why am I so upset?
I was in the Space Technology-5 (ST5) Mission Operations Center (MOC) at Goddard Space Flight Center. I’d been preparing for that day for two years, ever since we found out that someone was crazy enough to actually pay to launch this mission after all. Although I had other roles, my primary responsibility had been to develop the software tools that we would use to maneuver the three spacecraft into particular formations over the 90 day mission.
Of course, what you don’t know is that ST5 had always been the mission where if something could go wrong, it would. Launch day was no different in that regard. The state vector that we received indicated that our initial formation was all screwed up: the spacecraft were in the wrong order, were separating more quickly than expected, and the rocket body was in the middle of it all! The sun sensors were telling us that ST5 had managed to discover a second sun! Oh, and all the tracking data were either in an unexpected format or completely unusable, and radar passes couldn’t distinguish one spacecraft from another!
There’s an article on NasaWatch.com that I found rather interesting. Basically, it’s a response to the attention the Gen Y presentation has been gaining over the past few weeks. More interesting to me, however, is the responses given to this article from Gen X’ers and older. In particular, there’s the notion that instead of finding something broken or missing and fixing or inventing it, we’re complaining about not being in NASA leadership, programs, and the like. While it would be undeniably cool to hold any leadership position at NASA at the tender age of 27, all of us are, among other things, realists. We do understand and comprehend the concept of corporate ladders and hierarchies. We understand that Gen X, the Boomers, and those before them have already paid their dues to be in the positions they currently hold, and that we must do the same before we get to the same positions. As I stated in my last post, the Gen Y presentation points to a larger issue. It’s bigger than leadership positions, inclusions into decision making, and such. It’s about NASA as a whole lacking in the communications department.
One thing I believe everyone here should realize is that NASA has been, since it’s conception, a government organization. Thus, it adheres to certain government models (structure, executions of plans and procedures, and communications). On the whole, our government tends to hold information very close to the vest until that information has been combed, scrutinized, structured, and approved for release. NASA, being first and foremost a government entity, also follows this model. What we (Gen Y) are asking for is that NASA modify it’s external communications model by becoming more transparent to the public. After all, being a government organization means we are a public organization. We are funded only by the taxes the American people agree to pay; thus, we are responsible, first and foremost, to the public we serve. How does NASA serve the public? Well, everyone today is in love with GPS enabled cellphones, navigation systems in vehicles, satellite TV, advances in the medical field, environmental research, the list goes on and on. However, if you were to go to your neighbor and inquire about what they know about NASA, I would guess that the list would be rather short. Can this be rectified? Absolutely. How do we go about doing this? That requires change, and changing an organization requires individuals to do something that most people are very uncomfortable with, and that’s change themselves.
Just a few hours ago I found out about the Gen-Y presentation and opennasa.com. I must say that I am extremely excited that there are like minded people that are working at making NASA great. I got introduced to the presentation from one of my project leads (who has listened to me bring up many of the same things mentioned in the presentation) and I must say that I really like it; however, my lead brought up a good point. He stated that the presentation was very “hip” but that the presentation style was likely to get very little attention from NASA management. It falls under what I call “know your audience”, the presentation was a great presentation for young people and I am certain that anybody our age will love it (as I and many others did and will). Yet, older generations are more acclimated to having things presented to them more formally with charts and figures. I expect that NASA management will consider the presentation as “selfish” as Mensah stated in “The Larger Picture” because the NASA culture is military in nature. In their minds a good soldier does what they are told and doesn’t sass back. Don’t try telling them we are not in the miliatry because they will likely think you are being “selfish”.
Anyway the point to this post is to suggest that we should create a new presentation geared towards conveying the pressing issues that are blatantly apparent to Gen Y to the older generation leaders in a way that they can understand and not feel we are being “selfish”. I have read Wikinomics and that book has many good case studies that could be used in the presentation. I am certain that the users of opennasa.com are aware of much more information that would help make a compelling argument that will motivate our leaders to not only listen to us but agree with us.
“FITZPATRICK!!!” He’d call, running up and grabbing my facemask with a giant fist of hard, burly knuckles, “you’re running around like a blind dog in a meat house, son!”
Eloquent words recalled from my days prowling the defensive backfield as a free safety on the high school football practice fields. My coach would make it a point to yell from the complete opposite side of the field, making everyone stop in their tracks to watch his 260-pound frame barrel down on me to inform me that:
I’ve spent some time thinking about the Gen-Y presentation, the reactions to it, and what it means to NASA. Around NASA and around the ‘net, many people are saying that the Gen-Y presentation is, for lack of a better term, selfish. After all, we the people of Gen-Y, are asking, and almost demanding, that a government organization do better to connect with us. And while on the surface, this may seem to be a very selfish thing to demand, I think it points to a much larger issue.
In the most simple of terms, the Gen-Y presentation is saying that NASA is failing to communicate with the people of Gen-Y. Is this a true statement? I believe it is. Is it selfish for us to say that we want NASA to make a better effort to communicate with us? Well, it can seem that way, but you have to realize one thing: communication is a two way street. It takes both parties being willing to sit down at the table and lay the issues out. In my view, this presentation is about the Gen-Y people employed by NASA standing up and saying “we’re at the table”. Now NASA has to be willing to meet us halfway. However, as I stated before, I believe the Gen-Y presentation points to a larger issue: NASA is failing to communicate, period.
My name is Rivers Lamb. Yes, that’s an unusual name. No, my parents weren’t hippies, or at least they won’t admit to it. You can imagine that almost every time I meet someone, I’m asked about it. (answer: I’m named after my grandfather)
One time many years ago, I had a co-worker tell me that s/he thought the only reason I was hired was because someone must’ve seen my resume and my name and assumed that I was Native American. At the time, we had a good laugh over how white I really am.
Bill Gates testified before Congress today on the future of innovation and
We talk about encouraging young people to pursue science careers. But are we actually providing good incentives for them to do that? What opportunities are there for people to advance in careers are pure scientists at NASA? Look around you– who are the people in the senior positions? The “decision makers”? They may be people with scientific training, but they’re certainly not workaday scientists. When we ask “Where are all the scientists?”, it might do us good to look around and notice they’re all being promoted out of a job, and into management.
As a so-called young person trying to build a career in science, I’ve been told numerous times I’ll be doing so at the expense of more senior positions, and more pay. When I look around me for good examples, role models, mentors, I frankly have not one senior person in my professional life at NASA who has encouraged me in pursuing a path of pure science.
Something happened today that I just really want to share, and I don’t know of a better place to share it…
We have a high school intern doing some analysis. I haven’t been working with him directly until yesterday, when I came across some new testing that I didn’t have time to do myself. I’m rushing through trying to teach him how to do something because I need to leave for a meeting, trying to make sure that I’m dumping whatever knowledge I have that he’ll need to do the work while I’m in the meeting.
Recent Comments